Apr 19

Well this past week has been a bit hectic for me in part because I have personally taken a lot of flak on my positions regarding Taiwan and Tibet from my Chinese friends. The issue was further exacerbated this week by someone whom I thought had some respect for me but ended up turning quite nasty in our discussions over the subject. This person was not the only person that angered me but I have accepted circumstances as they  are. That being said I don’t approve of that kind of discourse and I simply cannot understand why some Chinese people assume this stonewalled position on China and its policies. There is literally no room for argument and if you do try to argue you end up being harassed by people or called names that I would rather no repeat in my blog. Needless to say after this past week I have come to realize that amongst my Chinese friends here in Ireland, I have a lot fewer friends than I once thought. Additionally I would like to state to any other Chinese person out there reading this blog or anyone else for that matter, I won’t tolerate racist or harassing comments or emails. Any further emails like that will be reported to your ISP and they can deal with your lack of intelligence.

I have been following the China/Tibet issue quite closely in the “western biased” media and found that the Chinese people are becoming more nationalistic than they already were. I was watching a segment on Al-Jazeera where they interviewed the girl (Jin Jing) below who “saved” the torch from the hands of a Tibetan protestor. She went on to say in the interview that the person who tried to disrupt the relay would get his just desserts if he happened to die. What???

Jin Jing

I think this girl’s actions and words are symptomatic of a larger issue that has taken over the Chinese populace. One of unfettered national pride, don’t get me wrong, I admire this girl for the athlete she is but actually advocating the death of someone else who was just trying to draw attention to the crisis in his home country (Tibet). That is simply wrong and the fact that she was glorified by the Chinese media shows something seriously wrong with CCTV and the other state-run media outlets.

I don’t understand how the people of China can confuse the issues here, people in the West do not have anything against the people of China or Chinese culture but we are protesting the thousands of people that have died or are silenced each year because they oppose the government. Just look at the USA, there are more than a handful of people who publish the craziest stories about the American government that could be considered “subversive” but do you see these people imprisoned for such activity, I think not.

The next big headline today is that the CNN website was attacked using a DOS (Denial of Service) attack by Chinese attackers with the rumor being that it was actually sponsored by the Chinese government. A DOS attack is when a website is bombarded with millions of service requests at one time so that it eventually shuts down from all the strain.  This is another demonstration of the government of China having gone too far; CNN has reported both sides of the story and focuses on the truth of the plight of the people in Tibet. If Chinese people want to criticize anything, they should focus on the lack of coverage by CCTV of anything other than the pro-Han side of the story.

A famous Oscar Wilde quote comes to mind:

 Patriotism is a virtue of the vicious

Some people often are a bit confused from where this quote comes from which is Life of Samuel Johnson (1791):

Patriotism having become one of our topics, Johnson suddenly uttered, in a strong determined tone, an apophthegm, at which many will start: ‘Patriotism is the last refuge of a scoundrel.’ But let it be considered that he did not mean a real and generous love of our country, but that pretended patriotism which so many, in all ages and countries, have made a cloak of self-interest.

Now this quote does not only apply to the people of China but to people all around the world. There is a fine line between blind nationalism and doing the right thing. At the moment the Chinese arguments for Tibet revolves around some antiquated historical fact, come on! This is not the past, we live in the present where every single person on this earth is entitled to their basic human rights.

In case some of you don’t remember the UN charter for human rights, please click the above the link but the most relevant right and the one that I most believe in is:

All human beings are born free and equal in dignity and rights.They are endowed with reason and conscience and should act towards one another in a spirit of brotherhood.

My biggest problem with China and the Olypmics on a personal level is that they claim that we should all come together in peace and harmony in the spirit of brotherhood. How can their be brotherhood when according to the human rights journal Dui Hua published in America, we only know about 5% of the dissidents that are jailed in China. There is no brotherhood when the minorities in Tibet like the Uighurs and the Tibetans are slowly ceasing to exist thanks to the Han majority. Lastly there is no real freedom in China until people, journalists and dissidents can publish whatever they want in criticism of the government, until CCTV shows both sides of a story and until the Chinese government fires their 30,000+ censors.

It’s a shame that the East and the West are so divided about the issue of the Olympics but having spoken to quite a few of my friends, they all  agree China should have never gotten the Olympics since if you look back to the last Olympics in Greece, things went super smoothly. I hope and I really do mean this that China and the West can work closer together and get past this issue of “The West trying to keep China down.” That is simply not true.

 

Feb 22

I am a big believer in the written and the spoken word but I suppose that is a given considering I am writing this blog on a Friday night. In recent weeks, the freedom of people all around the world has been compromised with the shutdown of Wikileaks.org by Judge Jeffrey White of the Northern District in San Francisco. Many people are aware of the prefix “Wiki” as in Wikipedia however not too many people know about Wikileaks.org in my humble opinion. This is a great site because it allows people from all over the world to anonymously post documents or media to expose corruption, unfair practices and injustices around the world.

To the bloggers who do read this site, you should have a look at some of the mirrors for the moment because there are a lot of useful articles for future posts.

Wikileaks is a great balancing mechanism in a world where government and big business are so closely allied that it is hard to tell them apart on certain days. Companies, governments and people in power take advantage of the system for their own benefit which is why we need sites like Wikileaks around. These sites do their best to even the odds in modern society and provide the biggest political punch for the ordinary citizen. The Judge shut down the site because someone anonymously posted confidential documents from a Swiss bank Julius Baer onto the website. The bank did not want these documents up there so they went to court in the USA to have it shut down however the information had already dispersed to people around the world as well as other mirror sites like:

http://www.cryptome.org/

http://www.wikileaks.be/wiki/Wikileaks

These are just two of the sites that have exactly the same information that the American Wikileaks was shut down for. Why Julius Baer went this far is beyond me since their lawyers must have told them that there was no cost efficient way that they could shut down every Wikileaks site around the world. The only other logical conclusion that I can figure out is that they are hoping to lessen the impact of these leaked documents by closing down the American site therefore reducing the traffic somewhat? I highly doubt that but beyond that stretch of a reason, it was just a waste of money and time.

The interesting ponderings from this case show how censorship has increased in the USA to a certain extent. The title of this blog is how the judiciary decides the balance between freedom and the safety of the people. I believe that censorship is justified if it protects the physical well being of the population from eminent bodily harm i.e. terrorism. Beyond that there is no other excuse to shut down a site like Wikileaks or any other site that actually makes society a better place. An interesting tidbit of information is that the judge in charge of this case was appointed by President Bush who I am sure got some calls from some very irritated rich people when their questionable finances were disclosed all over the internet.

Scales of Justice

I am not a Bush Basher but it is an interesting coincidence that when some of the richest and most influential people are exposed online in terms of them hiding their money from the IRS that all it takes is a simple call to the President who then makes another call and “bob’s my uncle” we have a ruling that clearly violates the “Safe Harbor” provision of the DMCA.

People have to able to say what they want to say, this is what makes America and other countries around the world great. The freedom for me to say I think the current President is somewhat incompetent is essential in a modern and progressive society. I often criticize the Chinese government to my friends for their open censorship of blogs like my own and other sites in the West. I don’t think that this kind of censorship is moral in this day and age, freedom needs to increase as oppose to decrease. That being said I would like to encourage everyone to support Wikileaks in California by writing to your congressman or political representative to tell them about this injustice, you can also support Wikileaks by pledging some money to this email:

supporters@sunshinepress.org

This is supposed to be a Political blog and some people who read this may question this post’s relevance but that is what I am trying to assure people, this is an issue that not only effects Wikileaks but people all around the world. Freedom is truly precious and we must treasure it and fight for it when we need to. For people in America have a look at project Global Integrity and their comparative study on censorship around the world and observe how the USA is no longer number 1 in terms of the most free information nation in the world. I would also like to extend my pledge of support to the Wikileaks group and wish them the best of luck with their upcoming court date.